FIFA has just announced VERY SAD NEWS for the Officials and Referees of the match between Chelsea vs Totheham and this have cost them thier Jo

Ange Postecoglou, who is known for his irritability, stated that his Tottenham players were “nowhere near good enough” following their 2-0 loss to Chelsea. However, he acknowledged that he was responsible for the lackluster performance that occurred at Stamford Bridge.

Mauricio Pochettino’s Chelsea team, which came into the match having lost their previous three matches without a victory, had an easy evening thanks to the goals scored by Trevor Chalobah and Nicolas Jackson, both of whom scored with their heads from the top of the box.

It is likely that the visitors were hoping for a significant response after suffering consecutive defeats in the Premier League at the hands of Newcastle and Arsenal. However, this reaction was not present in west London, and Postecoglou’s irritation turned into wrath as the first half came to a close.

Shortly after Chalobah’s first goal, television cameras recorded an angry Postecoglou ripping into Pape Matar Sarr and Cristian Romero. The 58-year-old coach was responsible for giving his players the full hairdryer treatment from his technical area.

However, Postecoglou’s rage did not make much of a difference on the night, and as a result, the north London club is now seven points behind Aston Villa, who are in fourth position, with four games left in their campaign.

“No, it is not adequate, and I have to accept responsibility for it,” she said. “Look, I’m looking at it.” In a barbed interview with Sky Sports after the match, Postecoglou took responsibility for the situation.

I am the manager, and I am the one who is putting them out there, and everything that they did was not even close to being satisfactory.

As I mentioned before, I need to investigate ways to solve all of this and figure out how I can have a greater influence on the situation.

In response to a question about the specific areas in which Tottenham fell short, Postecoglou stated, “Well, when we put on a performance like we did in the first half, it implies obviously that my message isn’t going through.”

It is up to me to address the matter.

When the Tottenham manager was asked to elaborate on his message that “didn’t go through” to the players, it was evident that he was having a negative reaction to the line of inquiry that was being posed by Patrick Davison of Sky Sports.

“Make a move, buddy. Our play was not very good. Do you have any desires? Would you like me to sit here and write you a report on the areas in which we failed? He retorted in a yell.

I’ll accept responsibility for the fact that we got off to a horrible start, as I mentioned before. Although I continue to believe that their goal was a foul, nobody seems to care about it.

However, we did not deserve anything more than that, and as I have stated before, it is my responsibility.

Postecoglou was eager to emphasize that his outburst of wrath was not related to the fact that his team had conceded, but rather to the manner in which they played throughout the first half of the match.

According to his explanation, “It wasn’t about giving up the goal; rather, it was about how we approached our football.”

“We were just not even close to being good enough, and we were not even close to being as optimistic as we need to be, and in this case, I am to blame.”

Throughout the course of the season, Tottenham has been guilty of surrendering much too readily from set pieces, and Postecoglou did not like Davison asking him why he appeared to be “unable to be engaged” in addressing the issue.

The response that he gave was snarky and said, “That is a pretty nice question.”

Although I did not state that I was not interested, I did mention that it was not a priority for me, but that is fine. It’s quite OK if folks believe that what we’re lacking is a set of set pieces. I’ll get the job done.’