Chelsea have finally decided to Mouricio Pochettino this weekend and his replacement has been named

In response to allegations made by Portugal, Chelsea has refuted the notion that Ruben Amorim traveled to London last week with the intention of having a conversation with the Blues, rather than West Ham, on the possibility of replacing Mauricio Pochettino.
Due to the fact that the coach of Sporting was seen in London just a few days before his team was scheduled to play Porto in the league, he was compelled to issue an apology over the weekend. The presumption was that he was in the city to meet with West Ham.
Amorim had been seen as a possible replacement for Jurgen Klopp at Liverpool for a considerable amount of time. However, the Reds’ acquisition of Arne Slot from Feyenoord caused him to shift his focus elsewhere, and it was reported that he had discussed the possibility of taking over from David Moyes at West Ham.
However, on Tuesday morning, a Portuguese journalist named Pedro Sepulveda made a shocking allegation that Chelsea had really arranged for the trip to take place. According to Sepulveda, Amorim had met with members of the club’s board to explore the possibility of succeeding Pochettino, who was under enormous amounts of pressure.
In spite of this, Chelsea has swiftly responded to the rumor by denying it. According to Matt Law of The Telegraph, the west Londoners are “absolutely sure” that they did not pay for Amorim’s journey to London.
After the conclusion of the current season, they will make a decision on Pochettino’s future, as well as any prospective search for a new manager. Furthermore, they did not hold any meetings or discussions with the 39-year-old throughout his time with the club.
There is a possibility that Pochettino would lose his job if the Blues are unable to qualify for Europe in the upcoming season. The Blues are now in ninth position in the Premier League standings, and they are facing a struggle to qualify for Europe.
At the present, his future is uncertain, and the outcomes – as well as his performances – in the upcoming match will play a significant role in determining his destiny. Any indication that the team is not doing well would reflect poorly on him given the current circumstances.
While this was going on, Amorim expressed his regret for traveling to London at a time when Sporting were still in the running for the championship. He also stated that it was a “mistake” to conduct discussions with another party.
Let’s get the most important thing out of the way first. One day, I’ll discuss about this topic. To begin, the club was aware of my journey. This is the first notable fact. Amorim stated on Saturday afternoon that it is significant and alters the context because of this.
The second scenario involves discussing the shroud of secrecy that surrounded the expedition. I parked the car outside in a “hidden” manner, walked past around fifteen people, took pictures with them, and then boarded the airplane.
Consequently, it is imperative that a portion of the action that was carried out behind our backs, primarily within the club, be removed.
The most essential thing is that I should not have gone on that vacation. In my opinion, the timing was entirely inappropriate, and I didn’t think it was appropriate at the moment.
It was improper, and it was much more so because I am so demanding with my players. I am usually the first to state that the team might not be able to solve the unique concerns of each player, and as a result, it was my responsibility.
“I have no choice except to acknowledge it and learn to live with it.” After giving it some thought, it is becoming quite evident. Another thing that is not true is that I did not explain anything to the players. I handed it on to the staff as well as the players.
“It is now time to go on, and I would also like to use the public part to officially apologize to the supporters of Sporting, the staff, and most importantly, to my players in public.”